Red Rock Casino Employee Seeks Dismissal of Union Legal Challenge
Posted on: January 23, 2022, 12:58h.
Last updated on: January 23, 2022, 12:58h.
At least one Red Rock Casino Resort & Spa worker in Las Vegas says her voice was indeed heard in the course of a 2019 unionization work. And efforts by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to overturn the outcome are unjust.
Raynell Teske, a Red Rock Casino employee, has partnered with the National Appropriate to Perform (NRTW), a nonprofit that gives cost-free legal aid to personnel whose human or civil rights have been potentially violated by unions. Together, Teske filed an amicus short final week in the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.
Crafted with the aid of NRTW attorneys, Teske argues that she and her colleagues held a fair union vote in December of 2019 that resulted in Red Rock Casino rejecting the Culinary Union. The secret ballot election tallied 627-534 against joining the effective casino union.
“Ms. Teske and her coworkers voted decisively against unionization, but an Obama-appointed judge imposed it on them anyway,” NRTW President Mark Mix said in a statement.
Lengthy, Complex Backstory
Following the union vote rejection, Cornele Overstreet, regional director of the NLRB office that tends to labor complaints filed in Las Vegas, intervened. Overstreet filed a federal injunction in the US District Court of Nevada asking a judge to override the employee vote.
Overstreet said numerous complaints filed with her office from Red Rock Casino workers contended that Station Casinos — owner of the glitzy casino resort located in affluent Summerlin — significantly improved spend and rewards in the leadup to the vote in order to sway workers from throwing their assistance behind the union. Overstreet stated “card checks” — the process of asking workers on an person basis to sign forms expressing their union help — revealed widespread majority backing to join Culinary.
In her amicus brief, Teske contends that the actual vote is a far more factual representation of union support, as some workers may be inclined to say they are supportive of the union to leaders attempting to organize, but have private reservations.
Teske’s amicus short argues those ‘card check’ signatures are unreliable proof of union support, and not explanation adequate to conclude the union ever had majority support,” a NRTW release to Casino.org explained. “As the NLRB and federal courts have recognized in other cases, secret ballots are a a lot more reliable way of gauging worker assistance for a union, simply because workers are typically pressured, harassed, or misled by union organizers into signing cards.”
The 9th Circuit in November upheld the US district court judge’s ruling that Station Casinos have to instantly begin bargaining with the Culinary Union, as a separate case to choose regardless of whether the casino operator purposely interfered with the union vote plays out.
The NLRB has the legal power to settle labor disputes in between workers and employers. The board has demanded, and the US district court has ordered, that Stations supply such confidential details relating to the decision to adjust positive aspects to the NLRB in order for it to establish if the firm purposely interfered with the union effort.